James Earl Psychosexual therapist Rcihmond SW London

The trigger word

4 July 2026


The word "trigger" has quietly taken over how we talk about emotional reactivity — and it's worth asking what work it's actually doing. A trigger, mechanically, is a device with one job: pull it, and the gun fires. No interpretation required, no gap between cause and effect. When we borrow this language for feelings, we import that same mechanical certainty — and it's the wrong model for what's actually happening.


"You trigger me" sounds like an accusation, but it's also a claim about causality: that your action produces my reaction the way a

trigger produces a shot. Automatically. Inevitably. Without me in the middle at all.


But I am in the middle. You did something — spoke a certain way, went quiet, forgot something. That's what you did. What happens next is mine: the flood of feeling, the story I tell myself about what it means, the old shape my body remembers and steps back into. That reaction very likely has history in it — years of repetition, familiarity, a nervous system that learned its patterns somewhere long before you arrived.


But learned is not the same as inevitable. A well-worn path is still a path I'm walking, not

one being walked for me.


This distinction matters clinically because "trigger" forecloses the very space therapy works in — the gap between stimulus and response, where reflection, choice, and change actually live. If your action simply causes my reaction, there's nothing to explore, nothing to metabolise, nothing to loosen. But if my reaction is mine — shaped by history, not determined by you — then it becomes something I can get curious about, rather than something I merely suffer or blame you for.


You did what you did. I reacted. The second sentence deserves its own subject.

Book a session